|
When we say, “every exercise is a question,” we’re reframing resistance training away from a checklist of movements and toward an ongoing inquiry into how an athlete’s system organizes itself under demand.
An exercise isn’t just something to do. It’s something designed to ask the body a very specific question. The Exercise as a Problem to Solve Every task places constraints on the athlete and invites a solution. Beneath the surface of sets and reps, the nervous system is constantly answering:
These aren’t abstract concepts. They’re revealed in real time through movement. The bar, the stance, the load, the tempo, the range of motio, each variable shapes the problem being presented. The Setup Is the Question Small changes in setup dramatically alter what the system is being asked to solve.
Nothing here is neutral. Every choice narrows or expands the solution space. Movement Is the Answer The athlete’s movement is the response to the question being asked. As coaches, our job isn’t to immediately correct, it’s to observe. We’re watching for patterns:
Progress isn’t just heavier weight or smoother reps. It’s a shift in how the problem is solved. Coaching Through Better Questions When the “answer” isn’t what we’re looking for, we don’t force the athlete into a predefined model. We change the question:
By doing so, we guide the system toward new solutions rather than imposing them. The athlete learns through interaction, not instruction alone. Training as Dialogue, Not Template This is why resistance training can’t be reduced to a template. It’s an ongoing dialogue between the individual and the environment, one where exercises act as prompts to reveal tendencies, challenge existing strategies, and expand the range of available solutions. When every exercise is treated as a question, training becomes less about prescribing movements and more about shaping adaptability. And adaptability, not perfection, is what ultimately transfers to performance.
0 Comments
The term repetition is used constantly in training, coaching, and performance environments. Yet the way we define a repetition strongly influences how we design practice, what we value in movement, and ultimately what athletes are prepared for.
At first glance, a repetition seems simple. But beneath the surface, there are two very different ways to understand what a rep actually is. The Traditional View of a Repetition Traditionally, a repetition is defined as a single execution of a prescribed movement, performed with the goal of reproducing the same pattern each time. In this view, the repetition is something to be repeated, refined, and perfected. Key characteristics of the traditional perspective include:
This is effective for building physical capacity, when the environment is stable and outcomes are known. However, human and sporting movement are rarely stable or predictable. Where the Traditional Definition Falls Short The challenge with this definition is not that it’s wrong, but that it’s incomplete. Sport demands constant adjustment. Opponents move differently. Space closes or opens unexpectedly. Timing shifts. Decisions must be made under pressure. When training only rewards identical movement outcomes, athletes may struggle when the environment no longer matches the script. This is where a nontraditional view of repetition becomes critical. The Nontraditional View of a Repetition In a nontraditional framework, a repetition is not a copy of a movement. Instead, it is a unique interaction with an environment. Each rep is shaped by constraints such as:
Even when the drill looks the same on the surface, the information available to the athlete is constantly changing. Key characteristics of this perspective include:
In this lens, movement variability isn’t something to eliminate, it’s something to learn from. Repetitions as Information When viewed nontraditionally, repetitions become information-rich experiences. Each rep provides feedback about:
Even if two reps look similar externally, they are never truly the same internally. The athlete must continually perceive, decide, and act. This is what drives:
Redefining the Purpose of Reps The shift from traditional to nontraditional thinking reframes training altogether. Repetitions are no longer about producing perfect movement copies. They are about developing a wide movement bandwidth; a range of solutions athletes can access when conditions change. In this sense, training isn’t about controlling athletes into ideal shapes. It’s about designing environments that invite exploration, decision-making, and adaptability. Because in sport, the athlete who adapts best doesn’t just move well, they solve problems well. |
Details
AuthorJamie Smith is a proud husband and father, passionate about all things relating to athletic development and a life long learner, who is open to unorthodox ideas as long they are beneficial to his athletes. Categories
All
|
RSS Feed