|
When we say, “every exercise is a question,” we’re reframing resistance training away from a checklist of movements and toward an ongoing inquiry into how an athlete’s system organizes itself under demand.
An exercise isn’t just something to do. It’s something designed to ask the body a very specific question. The Exercise as a Problem to Solve Every task places constraints on the athlete and invites a solution. Beneath the surface of sets and reps, the nervous system is constantly answering:
These aren’t abstract concepts. They’re revealed in real time through movement. The bar, the stance, the load, the tempo, the range of motio, each variable shapes the problem being presented. The Setup Is the Question Small changes in setup dramatically alter what the system is being asked to solve.
Nothing here is neutral. Every choice narrows or expands the solution space. Movement Is the Answer The athlete’s movement is the response to the question being asked. As coaches, our job isn’t to immediately correct, it’s to observe. We’re watching for patterns:
Progress isn’t just heavier weight or smoother reps. It’s a shift in how the problem is solved. Coaching Through Better Questions When the “answer” isn’t what we’re looking for, we don’t force the athlete into a predefined model. We change the question:
By doing so, we guide the system toward new solutions rather than imposing them. The athlete learns through interaction, not instruction alone. Training as Dialogue, Not Template This is why resistance training can’t be reduced to a template. It’s an ongoing dialogue between the individual and the environment, one where exercises act as prompts to reveal tendencies, challenge existing strategies, and expand the range of available solutions. When every exercise is treated as a question, training becomes less about prescribing movements and more about shaping adaptability. And adaptability, not perfection, is what ultimately transfers to performance.
0 Comments
General athletic qualities, strength, speed, plyometrics, coordination, build the foundation every athlete needs. They create the physical capacities that support performance. But those alone aren’t enough. To become truly sport ready, athletes must learn how to apply those qualities in dynamic, unpredictable environments.
That’s where small sided games (SSGs) come in. They provide the missing bridge between controlled training and real sport demands. SSGs shift training from rehearsed execution to authentic interaction. From closed patterns to open problems. From predictable reps to meaningful opportunities to perceive, decide, and act. Instead of teaching athletes how to “perform” drills, we teach them how to solve movement problems. Sport doesn’t reward perfect technique in a vacuum. It rewards athletes who can adapt quickly, intelligently, and under stress. No game cares how flawless an athlete looked in a cone drill. It cares whether they can adjust their body, their strategy, and their decisions when the situation changes in an instant. By intentionally introducing small doses of “venom”, manageable chaos, competitive tension, time pressure, spatial constraints, SSGs help athletes develop resilience and perception under conditions that feel closer to the real thing. The environment becomes the teacher, shaping solutions without micromanaging every movement. The result: Athletes who move with intent, think with clarity, and thrive in the messiness of competition. That’s the bridge. From general athletic development to genuine sport readiness. If we want athletes who can perform when it counts, we must pop the bubble and prepare them for the game they’ll actually play. In the pursuit of athletic excellence, it’s easy to assume that performance is built primarily through external instruction, coaches providing cues, drills, and corrections to shape technique. While external guidance plays a role, much of human movement learning actually arises from within.
This natural process, known as self-organization, refers to the body’s ability to coordinate and refine movement patterns through internal feedback mechanisms, without the need for constant external direction. Understanding this concept is fundamental to how athletes adapt, develop, and ultimately master motor skills. What Is Self-Organization? Self-organization is the body’s innate capacity to find efficient solutions to movement problems. When an athlete performs a new task, the body undergoes a process of trial and error, experimenting with different movement strategies until it discovers one that achieves the desired outcome with greater efficiency and precision. This is not random. It’s a deeply intelligent process driven by the interaction between the individual’s unique physical characteristics (such as structure, force potential, elasticity, and coordination), the task being performed, and the environment in which it occurs. Over time, the body “self-organizes” around these interacting constraints, producing more stable and effective movement patterns. The Role of the Sensory System At the heart of self-organization lies the sensory system, the body’s internal feedback network. When learning or refining a skill, athletes rely on a range of sensory inputs:
This sensory feedback forms a continuous loop: action, feedback, adjustment. Each movement provides information. Each repetition fine tunes perception. Over time, these micro-adjustments accumulate into more coordinated and smooth movement solutions. Adapting Through Exploration One of the most powerful aspects of self-organization is its adaptability. Because it’s not dependent on one fixed technique, the system can continuously adjust to new demands, whether that means a changing environment, a different opponent, or new task constraints. This is why the most skillful athletes often appear “fluid” and adaptable, they’re not simply reproducing a learned technique; they’re responding dynamically to what’s happening around them. When coaches provide athletes with opportunities to explore movement variability, different speeds, directions, surfaces, or constraints, they create the conditions for this adaptability to emerge. The goal isn’t perfection in one pattern but proficiency across many. Efficiency Through Emergence As the system refines itself, movement becomes more efficient. Self-organization naturally seeks the path of least resistance, the most effective way to accomplish a task with minimal effort. Once this efficiency is achieved, the underlying movement principles often transfer to related skills. For example, the rhythm and timing learned in a jump may later support sprinting or cutting actions. This adaptability highlights the interconnectedness of athletic movement, the same coordination patterns can be reorganized and applied across different contexts. Coaching Implications: Creating the Space for Discovery From a coaching perspective, understanding self-organization reshapes how we design learning environments. Instead of overloading athletes with cues and corrections, we can guide through design, manipulating constraints that invite exploration and self-discovery. Effective coaching:
By doing so, they allow the athlete’s own system to take over, to solve, refine, and stabilize movement solutions that are truly individualized. Conclusion: Let the Systems Work Self-organization reminds us that the human body is not a machine to be programmed, it’s a dynamic, adaptive system capable of solving complex problems through interaction and feedback. When coaches and athletes embrace this principle, development becomes less about replication and more about discovery. Movement becomes more smooth, adaptable, and resilient, not because it was taught perfectly, but because it was learned naturally. The key is to create the space for that process to happen. Let the body explore. Let the system organize. Let movement emerge. One of the guiding principles in our programming is complementarity, organizing training elements so they communicate with each other. Every movement should serve the broader objective of athletic transfer, not exist in isolation.
When it comes to speed development, that means aligning our plyometric work with the specific speed pattern we’re targeting. The goal isn’t just to “jump more” or “move faster,” but to help athletes feel and own the same shapes, pressures, and force vectors that are required for effective high speed athletic actions. When the drill and the plyometric speak the same language, the body listens, coordination sharpens, intent increases, and the adaptations actually stick. That’s how you drive meaningful transfer, not by rehearsing random or disconnected movements. The Complementary Framework We divide our plyometric work into two broad categories, extensive and intensive, and align both with the specific speed emphasis of the session: acceleration, max velocity, or curved sprinting. This structure allows the athlete’s nervous system to connect the dots between the sensations of jumping and sprinting, the shapes, the ground contacts, and the rhythm. Extensive Plyometrics (Used for rhythm, coordination, and force direction awareness) 1. Acceleration Emphasis:
Intensive Plyometrics (Used for high force production and elasticity under load) 1. Acceleration Emphasis:
Connecting It All This approach ensures that every plyometric task means something. Instead of stacking unrelated drills, we’re constructing an ecosystem of movement, where each jump, bound, and hop reinforces the same sensory and mechanical language as the sprint pattern it supports. The result? Athletes who don’t just practice speed but understand it through the way they move. They feel the ground differently, organize force more efficiently, and express the movement solutions their sport demands. In nature and engineering, few shapes are as reliable as the triangle. Unlike squares or rectangles, which can deform under pressure, triangles are inherently stable. Their shape cannot be altered without changing the length of one of their sides. This stability makes the triangle one of the strongest and most efficient structures for force transfer.
Force Distribution A triangle distributes applied force evenly along its sides, preventing stress from concentrating in one spot. This balanced distribution is why triangles are foundational in architecture, bridges, and even natural formations. When a triangle is in place, energy is managed instead of wasted, ensuring stability and durability. The Foot’s Three Arches This same principle exists in the human body, specifically in the foot. Three natural arches create a triangular structure that supports and distributes forces during movement:
Together, these arches form a dynamic base that balances stability with flexibility. They allow the foot to adapt to different surfaces, absorb shock, and efficiently transfer energy into the ground. The Foot as a Tripod One of our top priorities in athletic development is teaching awareness of all three arches. When the foot functions as a tripod, anchored through the medial, lateral, and transverse arches, it becomes a more adaptable and resilient platform for force exchange. This tripod setup improves ground contact, enhances balance, and maximizes the ability to produce and transfer force effectively. Closing Thought The triangle may be one of the strongest structures in nature, but in athletic development, it’s also one of the most overlooked. By connecting the foot’s three arches and reinforcing this natural triangle, athletes unlock a stronger, and more resilient foundation for movement. |
Details
AuthorJamie Smith is a proud husband and father, passionate about all things relating to athletic development and a life long learner, who is open to unorthodox ideas as long they are beneficial to his athletes. Categories
All
|
RSS Feed