*It must be noted that I am no way trying to “reinvent the wheel” in the strength and conditioning world. All of the knowledge and information that I have collected over the past 5 years has been through trial and error. I am a firm believer that coaching is an art and the only way to be successful is through application. You need to interact face-to-face (not over the internet) with athletes of all levels, 8 years old to first round draft picks. I am still continuing to grow and evolve as a coach, and will give recognition and credit when necessary.
This will be an introduction to what goes through my head, while planning a program for an athlete. There are 3 major categories that I must address before anything else. These include managing stressors, dynamic correspondence, and addressing limitations. First, managing stressors is the most important aspect and the most overlooked part of organizing a program. This topic has been addressed by Chad Smith (Juggernaut Training Systems), James “The Thinker” Smith (Power Development Inc.), Buddy Morris, and the late Charlie Francis (Legend). All of these resources have done of a great job explaining the importance of balancing stressors. But it still amazes me how very little actually apply this knowledge. My primary clientele are hockey athletes of all ages and levels. The “hockey culture” in Massachusetts is by far the hardest working and driven group of athletes that I have ever had the pleasure to coach. Their mentality of more is never enough has continuously developed elite prospects year after year. But at the same time a lot of these young athletes are developing injuries at an alarming rate. It should also be noted that there could be even more of these top prospects, but most of these “kids” burn out at a young age. Anyways, my role as a strength coach is to assist in the player developmental process. Consolidating stressors is simply putting all off the high intensive sessions (both on and off ice) on the same day. So if an athlete has an easy skate or day off from the ice. Then on that same day the off ice training will be more extensive. This will allow for full recovery and a high level of preparedness for competition. This becomes more critical as an athlete gets older and more advanced within their specific sport. The time of year (off-season vs. in-season) will also play a role, but that can be for another post. I just wanted to make it clear the more is not always better. As a strength coach my goal is to find the least amount of stress that causes a positive stimulus. Training smart is training hard! The second piece is the importance of dynamic correspondence. This is a fancy term for movements that have a high transfer to the specific sport. With any type of programming no matter the training level or sport, there should always be a progression from general to specific movements. Now remember the actual movements, whether general or specific will differ between athletes, but the end result stays the same. To keep it simple and to the point I will use the sport of hockey as an example. An athlete playing for a local U14 team would start off by doing a bodyweight lateral squat and throughout the off-season progress to more of a reactive lateral bound. It must be noted that throughout the year I will have my athlete perform some type of jump and throw variation. The two things that change are the amount (volume) and type of jumps and throws (low vs. high skill level). Now with an athlete playing in Hockey East, I could have that athlete start with a Weighted Lateral Squat and throughout the off-season progress to a ISO Split Squat Reactive Lateral Bound (Got this from Kevin Neeld). There are also many variables that take part with exercise selection, training methods, etc… but for this post understand that the goal of any quality program is to use movements that will have a high transfer to whatever sport you play. The third component is to address any of the athlete’s limitations and weaknesses. In my situation, the hockey season is very long and demanding. Therefore I have a quick assessment to address any structural and soft tissue problems that might have been developed by the volume of skating and contacts. This will determine the do’s and don'ts when it comes time for exercise selection. I will also include some mobility and stability movements as fillers in between the warm-up sets of there primary exercises. This is athlete specific and once the athlete has no pain and is moving properly, I will decrease the volume and the importance of the filler as we progress through the program. Another way to attack these limitations is prior to every training session my athletes go through a specific warm-up that will continually address all of the problematic issues that are common for that sport. This would be a great time to note how I didn’t use the word “corrective exercise”. I know there are many different schools of thought from the “functional” to the “power-lifter” type coaches. Please remember everything we do from mobility, stability, power, strength, and/or energy system development is a form of corrective exercise. Being a strength coach, my primary responsibility is to keep my athlete’s healthy as I help them with their goals on the ice. As for attacking an athlete’s weakness whether its strength, power, speed, work-capacity, and/or body composition. The majority (especially with the athletes I coach) will need to improve basic strength capabilities. There should always be an emphasis on developing strength. Remember everything is built upon strength, a stronger athlete will be more explosive, faster, and more likely to stay injury free. Please note I do understand there are many strength qualities and depending on the training level and time year will dictate which quality you will focus on. But at this time the take away message is that with a quality program an athlete’s weakness should be transformed into one of their strengths. These 3 components are critical in developing a quality training program that will generate results. There are many other variables that I did not cover, but start thinking about these 3 and your setting yourself up for success.
0 Comments
The following contains background information on how I organize my off-season programs for hockey. They’re various forms of program design (periodization), but I have always chosen to follow a concurrent with an emphasis style for my team sport athletes. This is where all the qualities (speed, power, strength, etc…) are trained at the same time. Depending on the time of year (pre, in, post, or off-season) and athlete (sport and position) will determine which quality will have the focus of the specific training session. To keep it simple, the major parameter that changes is the volume of the targeted quality.
When organizing a program, I consider the length (in season, off-season, preseason, and post-season) and the frequency, that is, how many days per week the athlete will train. For the purpose of this article, I will show an off-season, 9-week program with training sessions performed 4 days per week. Once length and frequency are settled, I organize training by CNS intensive or extensive stimulus. I believe in a high and low scheme where the high stressors are on the same day and the low stressors are on the same day, as this allows for more efficient rate of recovery. This off-season program includes: 2 CNS Intensive sessions (Day 1 and Day 3) 2 CNS extensive sessions (Day 2 and Day 4) Exercise selection and training methods for the different qualities are then finalized. The different qualities addressed are: Speed Explosiveness Strength (Primary, Assistive, and Auxiliary) Energy System Development (A-Lactic Power or Capacity, Aerobic Capacity, Etc…) It’s important to note that the programming process is largely dependent on a variety of factors individual to the athlete. Primary among them are age, gender, training history, and injury history (orthopedic). Sport and position round up the primary determinants for the programming process, as different athletes, in different sports, in varying positions may require unique training adjustments. I reserve the off-season for a major emphasis on speed. I have found with hockey athletes that it is very important to incorporate linear and multi-directional speed drills into the program. On the multi-directional speed days the athlete will progress from a closed to open style of drills. The closed drills will have definite start and finish. Where as the open drills will have a visual or auditory command. These drills will have a specific start but undetermined finish. The program has 2 days of high quality speed drills with complete recovery. This improves a-lactic power outputs. I stress to my athletes the need for technical perfection with every repetition, a 100% percent effort, and a full recovery between each set. Speed drills are always performed at the beginning of the training, preceded by a proper warm up. The warm up ensures full physical preparedness. Explosive movements are programmed on all 4 days. Day 1 and 3 will follow the speed drills. Days 2 and 4 will be at the beginning of the training sessions prior to the primary strength movement. The higher stress explosive movements will be performed on the same day as the speed drills. These movements are also organized into two different categories, linear and lateral. The linear explosive movements will be performed on the same day as the linear speed drills with an emphasis on acceleration. The lateral explosive movements will be performed on the same day as the multi-directional speed drills with an emphasis on change of direction. The two other training sessions, the CNS extensive sessions, will contain less stressful explosive movements. These sessions may include different jumps, bounds, hops, and medicine ball throws. These less stressful sessions will include movements of slower velocity, lower skill, and of single response outputs. This portion of the program (speed and explosive movements) is where I place an importance on a principle known as Dynamic Correspondence. This principle will help in choosing different movements that will have the highest transferability to the athlete’s sport (Hockey). There are 5 different criteria that must be followed for the exercise selection. The 5 Criteria of Dynamic Correspondence:
Strength movements follow the explosive portion of the program. Strength programming is split into primary strength, assistive strength, auxiliary strength, and mobility/stability drills. During the 2 CNS intensive training sessions the athlete will perform a squat or dead-lift variation as their primary strength exercise. Squatting and dead-lifting place a tremendous amount of stress on the athlete’s system. Subsequently, there are more intensive external loads compared to bench-pressing variations. Because bench-pressing variations put less stress on the athlete than squatting or dead-lifting, they are programmed into the 2 CNS extensive training sessions. Each training block will have an eccentric, isometric, and dynamic emphasis (complex and contrast method). Block 1 includes an eccentric emphasis with assistive and auxiliary movements. Block 2 will use an isometric emphasis with the assistive and auxiliary movements. Block 3, the final block, will have a dynamic emphasis (complex and contrast method) with primary and assistive movements. The final part of the program is what I refer to as “Energy System Development.” This will be different depending on the time of year, as pre-season, in-season, post-season, and off-season all have different requirements. Also taken into consideration are the current training block and athlete’s sport and respective position. This off-season program during Block 1 will have 2 days of energy system development on the CNS extensive sessions. This will consist on improving aerobic fitness through the “tempo” method. This will change from training Block 1, 2, and 3. Here is an outline of my off-season Block 1 training program. Day 1 (CNS Intensive) Speed: Linear Speed Development (Acceleration) Explosive: Linear Jumps, Bounds, Hops and Medicine Ball Horizontal Push Throws Primary Strength: Squat Variation (Squat, Front Squat, Goblet Squat, Etc…) Mobility/ Stability Drill: Athlete Specific Assistive Strength: Single Leg Variation (90-90 Split Squat, RFESS, Forward Lunge, Reverse Lunge, Etc…) Auxiliary Strength: Upper Back Variation (Face-pull, Pull-down, Y-Drill, Etc…) Core Variation (Plank, Roll-Out, Body Saw, Fall-Out, Etc…) Day 2 (CNS Extensive) Explosive: Vertical Jump (Squat Jumps), Plyo Push-up, and Horizontal Jump (Broad or Stair Jumps w/ Single Response) Primary Strength: Bench Press Variation (Bench, Floor, Board, Close Grip, Etc…) Mobility/ Stability Drill: Athlete Specific Assistive Strength: Row Variation (Barbell, 1-Arm DB, Chest Supported, Etc…) Push-up Variation (Incline, Flat, Decline, Etc…) Auxiliary Strength: Upper Back Variation (Scarecrow, Band Pull-a-part, Prone DB Raise, Etc…) Elbow Flexor / Extensor Variation (Hammer Curl, Zotman Curl, Supinated Curl, Band Push-down, Elbow-out Extensions, Dips, Etc…) Core Variation (Reverse Crunch Variation) Energy System Development: Aerobic Capacity- “Tempo” Runs (Flat, Hill, Sled, Etc…) Day 3 (CNS Intensive) Speed: Multi-Directional Speed Development (Change of Direction) Explosive: Lateral Bounds, Hops, Jumps and Rotational Medicine Ball Throws Primary Strength: DL Variation (Trap Bar, Conventional, Sumo) Assistive Strength: Posterior Chain Dominant Variation (GHR, BB Hip Thrust, RDL, Etc…) Auxiliary Strength: Upper Back Variation (Face-pull, Pull-down, Y-Drill, Etc…) Core Variation (Belly Press and Hold, Side Plank, SB “Stir the Pot”, Etc…) Day 4 (CNS Extensive) Explosive: Vertical Jump (Single Leg Squat Jumps or Kneeling Jumps), OH Medicine Ball Slam, Horizontal Jump (Hurdle Jump w/ Single Response) Primary Strength: Bench Press Variation (Bench, Floor, Board, Close Grip, Etc…) Mobility/ Stability Drill: Athlete Specific Assistive Strength: Chin/Pull-up or Inverted Row Variation (Barbell or Blast Strap) Vertical Push Variation (Angled Press, DB OH Press, DB Incline Press, Etc…) Auxiliary Strength: Upper Back Variation (Scarecrow, Band Pull-a-part, Shoulder ER with Y-Press, Etc…) Elbow Flexor / Extensor Variation (Hammer Curl, Zotman Curl, Supinated Curl, Band Push-Down, Elbow-Out Extensions, Dips, Etc…) Core Variation (Reverse Crunch Variation) Energy System Development: Aerobic Capacity- “Tempo” Runs (Flat, Hill, Sled, Etc…) |
Details
AuthorJamie Smith is a proud husband and father, passionate about all things relating to athletic development and a life long learner, who is open to unorthodox ideas as long they are beneficial to his athletes. Categories |