|
For decades, strength and conditioning has leaned on a structured, linear mindset: identify an exercise, build a progression, and scale it up or down through regressions. It’s clean, organized, and easy to coach across large groups. But as our understanding of movement, learning, and individual variability evolves, so too must the way we design training.
The question is no longer just what’s the next step? It’s what does this athlete need, right now? The Traditional Model: Progression–Regression The progression–regression framework is built on predictability. Coaches map out a sequence:
On paper, it works. It creates structure, ensures exposure to foundational patterns, and provides a clear roadmap for long-term development. But in practice, it assumes something that rarely exists in real environments: Uniformity. Athletes don’t arrive as blank slates. They come with:
When everyone is pushed through the same pathway, even with regressions available, training can become less about solving problems and more about fitting into a system. The Limitation: One Path, Many Athletes The issue isn’t that progressions and regressions are wrong, it’s that they’re often too rigid. They tend to:
In a dynamic system like the human body, fixed pathways can create bottlenecks. Two athletes might perform the same “progression,” but arrive there through entirely different needs, or be held back by entirely different constraints. The Agile Programming Model An agile approach shifts the focus from pre-planned pathways to real-time decision making. Instead of asking: “What’s the next progression?” We ask: “What is this athlete showing me today?” Agile programming is built on four key considerations: 1. Structure Anthropometrics, joint architecture, and physical makeup influence how an athlete organizes movement. Not every position or pattern will look the same or should. 2. Action Capabilities What can the athlete currently produce, manage, and control? Force, velocity, coordination, timing, these qualities fluctuate daily and evolve over time. 3. Rate Limiters What’s holding them back right now? It could be speed, strength, perception, or even confidence. 4. Enhancers What gives them an advantage? Leveraging “strengths” is just as important as addressing the limiters. From Pre-Planned to Adaptive In an agile system, training is not locked into a rigid sequence. It becomes fluid and responsive, allowing for:
The goal isn’t to eliminate structure, it’s to make structure adaptable. Built-In Autonomy: The Missing Link One of the most powerful aspects of the agile model is training autonomy. Athletes aren’t just following instructions, they’re:
This creates a different type of engagement:
And ultimately, that leads to more “sticky” learning, skills and qualities that transfer beyond the weight room. The Weight Room as a Dynamic Environment In an agile system, the weight room becomes less about executing perfect reps and more about navigating constraints. Instead of: “Everyone moves from A > B > C” It becomes: “Here’s the task. Find a solution that works.” This doesn’t mean chaos. It means guided variability:
Bridging the Gap This isn’t about choosing one model and abandoning the other. Progressions and regressions still have value, they provide reference points. But they shouldn’t become rails that limit movement. Athletic development isn’t linear. It’s adaptive, nonlinear, and deeply individual. When we move beyond rigid pathways and start designing for the athlete in front of us, not the template on paper, we unlock something far more powerful: Training that evolves as the athlete does.
0 Comments
One of the guiding principles in our programming is complementarity, organizing training elements so they communicate with each other. Every movement should serve the broader objective of athletic transfer, not exist in isolation.
When it comes to speed development, that means aligning our plyometric work with the specific speed pattern we’re targeting. The goal isn’t just to “jump more” or “move faster,” but to help athletes feel and own the same shapes, pressures, and force vectors that are required for effective high speed athletic actions. When the drill and the plyometric speak the same language, the body listens, coordination sharpens, intent increases, and the adaptations actually stick. That’s how you drive meaningful transfer, not by rehearsing random or disconnected movements. The Complementary Framework We divide our plyometric work into two broad categories, extensive and intensive, and align both with the specific speed emphasis of the session: acceleration, max velocity, or curved sprinting. This structure allows the athlete’s nervous system to connect the dots between the sensations of jumping and sprinting, the shapes, the ground contacts, and the rhythm. Extensive Plyometrics (Used for rhythm, coordination, and force direction awareness) 1. Acceleration Emphasis:
Intensive Plyometrics (Used for high force production and elasticity under load) 1. Acceleration Emphasis:
Connecting It All This approach ensures that every plyometric task means something. Instead of stacking unrelated drills, we’re constructing an ecosystem of movement, where each jump, bound, and hop reinforces the same sensory and mechanical language as the sprint pattern it supports. The result? Athletes who don’t just practice speed but understand it through the way they move. They feel the ground differently, organize force more efficiently, and express the movement solutions their sport demands. Today’s modern-day athlete no longer experiences a true off-season. Whether it’s playing the same sport across multiple teams, back-to-back seasons, travel tournaments, showcases, or exposure camps, most youth and high school athletes spend the entire year bouncing from one competitive environment to the next. The result? Very little time with no competition, no pressure, and no physiological “reset.”
This reality changes the training conversation. It has to. If an athlete is competing 10–11 months out of the year, we cannot pretend we’re operating in a traditional offseason, preseason, in-season model. Training must reflect the actual demands placed on today’s athletes, not the outdated calendar that once existed. Why Volume Becomes the First Variable to Control When competition never stops, fatigue is no longer a temporary phase, it’s a constant threat. Games, practices, skill sessions, travel, and emotional stress all drain from the same systems that training draws from. Something has to give. This is why the primary parameter we manipulate is overall volume. Not because volume is “bad,” but because athletes already accumulate significant workload from the sport itself. Stacking high-volume training on top of high-volume competition is a fast track to:
Most athletes don’t need more work. They need smarter-placed, smarted-timed, and smarter-dosed training. Our Rule of Thumb: Cut the Volume in Half At The U of Strength, our approach is simple: Whatever workload seems “normal,” we reduce it by roughly 50%. This can be done by manipulating:
Low volume does not mean low quality. In fact, reducing volume allows us to raise intensity, attention, speed, intent, and technical precision. We train the qualities that matter, without draining the athlete for what they must do tomorrow. The Goal: Stimulate, Don’t Accumulate Especially in a relentless competition calendar, the mission of physical preparation is to:
Our lens shifts from “How much can we do?” to: “What is the minimum effective dose that moves the needle?” Because sustainable progress, not temporary exhaustion, is the real metric of success. The Modern Standard for Long-Term Development If an athlete rarely stops competing, then the weight room must be a place that restores, refines, and prepares, not just piles on more stress. When volume is managed, athletes can:
This is long-term athletic development in 2025 and beyond. Low volume isn’t a shortcut. It’s a necessity. And in today’s landscape, it’s one of the most powerful tools we must protect the athlete and evolve their performance over time. 6/3/2025 How Many Repetitions Should I Perform? Rethinking Reps Through the Lens of Motor Learning and Athletic DevelopmentRead Now“Should I do sets of 3, 8, or 10?”
It’s a common question in athletic development and strength training. And while the answer depends on your goals, it’s also easy to get lost in the numbers and lose sight of something more fundamental: the intention behind each movement and the connection between them. Reps matter, but not as much as why and how you’re doing them. Repetition Schemes Have Their Place Let’s not dismiss reps entirely. Different rep schemes serve different physiological purposes. These ranges are useful tools in the toolbox, but they’re not the whole picture, especially when the goal is improved movement capability, coordination, or transfer to sport. Movement Intent Comes First If you’re mindlessly grinding through a set of 10 without understanding what you’re trying to achieve, you’re missing the mark. What matters more than the exact rep count is:
Intent drives adaptation. If your focus is on owning internal rotation during a split squat, or maintaining inside edge pressure during a lateral step-up, that intent will shape the outcome, regardless of whether you’re doing 3 reps or 10. The Power of Connection: Movement Truths Every exercise is an opportunity to reinforce movement truths, the fundamental motor strategies that show up both inside and outside the weight room. When reps are approached with connection in mind, the result is what some coaches call “sticky” behaviors, patterns that hold under pressure, fatigue, or the unpredictability of sport. Examples include:
These aren’t isolated movements; they’re puzzle pieces that fit into the broader picture of athletic performance. Reps Are a Tool, not a Rule Instead of asking, “How many reps should I do?”, consider asking:
If those questions are answered clearly, then 3 reps might be plenty, or you might need 8 to get the desired effect. Don’t let numbers on a page dictate the depth of your training. Reps don’t build athletes. Intention and connection do. Let the reps support your purpose, not define it. The sport of basketball consists of various bio-dynamics and bio-motor abilities. It is quite obvious that in the sport of basketball an athlete needs to improve their speed and power qualities. More specifically the athlete needs to be efficient with their multi-directional speed (changing direction and velocity) and vertical explosiveness.
This can be accomplished through different speed and power drills, but if your in a situation where you have limited space, equipment and/ or if the athlete performs high amounts of volume with the competitive movements (during the off-season) then incorporating the eccentric method would be very beneficial. It is very important to note that every dynamic movement seen in basketball will always begin with an eccentric action. The eccentric phase of a movement is known as the lengthening or yielding portion caused by the force of a specific load. While increasing an athlete’s eccentric strength, there are two neuromuscular processes that need to be developed. The first is known as the stretch reflex and the second is the stretch shortening cycle (SSC), both are very important for the increase in force production. The stretch reflex is one of the most powerful responses within the human body. This reflex consist of 2 proprioceptors, muscle spindles and Golgi tendon organs (GTO). The muscle spindles primary function is to measure the changes in length and communicating to the brain about the proper amount of muscle contraction to overcome the external load. The GTO is the opposite and tells the brain when the muscle should relax by measuring the change in force. The GTO is very important because it will inhibit and prevent serious muscular damage (autogenic inhibition). But can also be detrimental to an athlete trying to produce high levels of force specific to the sporting demands. Here are three major reasons an athlete should incorporate the eccentric method: First, the autogenic inhibition can be decrease via the eccentric method. While focusing on the eccentric phase, the athlete is training both proprioceptors. The primary training effect is to improve the neuromuscular system with the neural pathways between the muscle spindle, CNS and muscle. Simultaneously decreasing the GTO activity, which will allow the athlete to absorb higher levels of force. Second and often overlooked is the ability to absorb force. In my opinion as coach the athlete needs to efficiently absorb force before producing force. An athlete who can absorb more energy via the eccentric phase will have a greater ability to produce more concentric force. This is accomplished by the stretch shortening cycle. A great analogy is the stretching of a rubber band. As the rubber band is stretched or lengthened, there is an increase in stored elastic energy. The same is true for the an athlete, the more energy absorb eccentrically, the more energy will be applied concentrically. This will teach the athlete how to efficiently decelerate. This will have a greater training effect than some of the common “agility” or “ladder” drills. On a side note, I am not a fan of the so called “speed or agility ladder”. Teaching an athlete to perform different drills in a confined environment will not improve an athlete’s linear and multi-directional speed. It actually reinforces poor technique and limits the athlete’s ability to put enough force into the ground. Third, increasing the intensity of the movement without having to increase the load. If an athlete is constantly performing a high amount of volume with their competitive exercises, the coach needs to manage the training parameters. Incorporating the eccentric method will allow the athlete to train with sub-maximal loads, but at the same time the relative intensity is increased. Also in my opinion the eccentric method will follow a low to medium volume scheme. A by-product of emphasizing the eccentric phase, is improving the execution of the movement. Controlling and slowing down the tempo the eccentric portion will give the athlete the ability to improve their technique. The eccentric method is extremely taxing on the athlete, I recommend programming this method for a 2-3 week training block during the athlete’s off-season. This method can be performed with maximal intensity (90% +), but in my opinion the risk to reward is not going to benefit the athlete. I suggest that the intensity stays with in the 50-70% range and volume will be determined by the athlete’s preparedness/ training level. Previously stated, I suggest keeping the volume low to medium. The tempo of the eccentric phase will be determined by the movement, but should be performed with 4-6 seconds count. It’s important to know as a coach if you tell an athlete to perform a 4 second eccentric, the athlete will usually perform a 3 second eccentric. This will primarily occur with novice athletes and/ or when the athlete becomes fatigued. My two recommendations are having the athlete perform the movement with a coach’s command or a clock count. If there is a lack of equipment or if the group is very large, I suggest telling the athlete to perform a 5 second eccentric. By increasing the count by 1 second, this will leave some room for error and then the athlete will perform the correct tempo prescribed. Lastly, each eccentric emphasized repetition should be completed with a dynamic or explosive concentric. This is crucial because the eccentric and concentric phases are used by two different neurological pathways. As a coach it’s imperative to cue the athlete to accelerate the concentric phase as fast and explosive as possible. This will correctly train the athlete’s nervous system and increase a positive transfer to the sport of basketball. The primary goal with a quality physical preparation program is to increase the athlete’s performance levels with proper training methods/ means that will elicit the correct adaptations. Increasing the athlete’s eccentric strength levels will have an impact on their force production. It is essential that an athlete efficiently transitions from eccentric, isometric and concentric phases. This will allow the athlete to complete movements with greater force and higher velocities on the court. |
Details
AuthorJamie Smith is a proud husband and father, passionate about all things relating to athletic development and a life long learner, who is open to unorthodox ideas as long they are beneficial to his athletes. Categories
All
|
RSS Feed